/* Hash tables.
- Copyright (C) 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ Copyright (C) 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-This file is part of Wget.
+This file is part of GNU Wget.
-This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+GNU Wget is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
-(at your option) any later version.
+the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at
+your option) any later version.
-This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+GNU Wget is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. */
+along with Wget; if not, write to the Free Software
+Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
+
+In addition, as a special exception, the Free Software Foundation
+gives permission to link the code of its release of Wget with the
+OpenSSL project's "OpenSSL" library (or with modified versions of it
+that use the same license as the "OpenSSL" library), and distribute
+the linked executables. You must obey the GNU General Public License
+in all respects for all of the code used other than "OpenSSL". If you
+modify this file, you may extend this exception to your version of the
+file, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do
+so, delete this exception statement from your version. */
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
# include <config.h>
#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_STRING_H
+# include <string.h>
+#else
+# include <strings.h>
+#endif /* HAVE_STRING_H */
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include "hash.h"
#ifdef STANDALONE
+# undef xmalloc
+# undef xrealloc
+# undef xfree
+
# define xmalloc malloc
# define xrealloc realloc
-#endif
+# define xfree free
-/* This file implements simple hash tables based on linear probing.
- The hash table stores key-value pairs in a contiguous array. Both
- key and value are void pointers that the hash and test functions
- know how to handle.
-
- Although Knuth & co. recommend double hashing over linear probing,
- we use the latter because it accesses array elements sequentially
- in case of a collision, yielding in better cache behaviour and
- ultimately in better speed. To avoid collision problems with
- linear probing, we make sure that the table grows as soon as the
- fullness/size ratio exceeds 75%. */
+# undef TOLOWER
+# define TOLOWER(x) ('A' <= (x) && (x) <= 'Z' ? (x) - 32 : (x))
+#endif
-struct ht_pair {
+/* INTERFACE:
+
+ Hash tables are an implementation technique used to implement
+ mapping between objects. Assuming a good hashing function is used,
+ they provide near-constant-time access and storing of information.
+ Duplicate keys are not allowed.
+
+ This file defines the following entry points: hash_table_new
+ creates a hash table, and hash_table_destroy deletes it.
+ hash_table_put establishes a mapping between a key and a value.
+ hash_table_get retrieves the value that corresponds to a key.
+ hash_table_contains queries whether a key is stored in a table at
+ all. hash_table_remove removes a mapping that corresponds to a
+ key. hash_table_map allows you to map through all the entries in a
+ hash table. hash_table_clear clears all the entries from the hash
+ table.
+
+ The number of mappings in a table is not limited, except by the
+ amount of memory. As you add new elements to a table, it regrows
+ as necessary. If you have an idea about how many elements you will
+ store, you can provide a hint to hash_table_new().
+
+ The hashing and equality functions depend on the type of key and
+ are normally provided by the user. For the special (and frequent)
+ case of using string keys, you can use the pre-canned
+ make_string_hash_table(), which provides an efficient string
+ hashing function, and a string equality wrapper around strcmp().
+
+ When specifying your hash and test functions, make sure the
+ following holds true:
+
+ - The test function returns non-zero for keys that are considered
+ "equal", zero otherwise.
+
+ - The hash function returns a number that represents the
+ "distinctness" of the object. In more precise terms, it means
+ that for any two objects that test "equal" under the test
+ function, the hash function MUST produce the same result.
+
+ This does not mean that each distinct object must produce a
+ distinct value, only that non-distinct objects must produce the
+ same values! For instance, a hash function that returns 0 for
+ any given object is a perfectly valid (albeit extremely bad) hash
+ function. A hash function that hashes a string by adding up all
+ its characters is another example of a valid (but quite bad) hash
+ function.
+
+ The above stated rule is quite easy to enforce. For example, if
+ your testing function compares strings case-insensitively, all
+ your function needs to do is lower-case the string characters
+ before calculating a hash. That way you have easily guaranteed
+ that case differences will not result in a different hash.
+
+ - If you care about performance, choose a hash function with as
+ good "spreading" as possible. A good hash function will react to
+ even a small change in its input with a completely different
+ resulting hash. Finally, don't make the hash function itself
+ overly slow, because you'll be incurring a non-negligible
+ overhead to reads and writes to the hash table.
+
+ Note that neither keys nor values are copied when inserted into the
+ hash table, so they must exist for the lifetime of the table. This
+ means that e.g. the use of static strings is OK, but objects with a
+ shorter life-time need to be copied (with strdup() or the like in
+ the case of strings) before being inserted. */
+
+/* IMPLEMENTATION:
+
+ All the hash mappings (key-value pairs of pointers) are stored in a
+ contiguous array. The position of each mapping is determined by
+ the hash value of its key and the size of the table: location :=
+ hash(key) % size. If two different keys end up on the same
+ position (hash collision), the one that came second is placed at
+ the next empty position following the occupied place. This
+ collision resolution technique is called "linear probing".
+
+ There are more advanced collision resolution mechanisms (quadratic
+ probing, double hashing), but we don't use them because they incur
+ more non-sequential access to the array, which results in worse
+ cache behavior. Linear probing works well as long as the
+ fullness/size ratio is kept below 75%. We make sure to regrow or
+ rehash the hash table whenever this threshold is exceeded.
+
+ Collisions make deletion tricky because finding collisions again
+ relies on new empty spots not being created. That's why
+ hash_table_remove is careful to rehash the mappings that follow the
+ deleted one. */
+
+/* When hash table's fullness exceeds this threshold, the hash table
+ is resized. */
+#define HASH_FULLNESS_THRESHOLD 0.75
+
+/* The hash table size is multiplied by this factor with each resize.
+ This guarantees infrequent resizes. */
+#define HASH_RESIZE_FACTOR 2
+
+struct mapping {
void *key;
void *value;
};
struct hash_table {
- unsigned long (*hash_function) (const void *);
- int (*test_function) (const void *, const void *);
+ unsigned long (*hash_function) PARAMS ((const void *));
+ int (*test_function) PARAMS ((const void *, const void *));
int size; /* size of the array */
- int fullness; /* number of non-empty fields */
int count; /* number of non-empty, non-deleted
fields. */
- struct ht_pair *pairs;
+ int resize_threshold; /* after size exceeds this number of
+ entries, resize the table. */
+ int prime_offset; /* the offset of the current prime in
+ the prime table. */
+
+ struct mapping *mappings; /* the array of mapping pairs. */
};
-#define ENTRY_DELETED ((void *)0xdeadbeef)
+/* We use NULL key to mark a mapping as empty. It is consequently
+ illegal to store NULL keys. */
+#define NON_EMPTY(mp) (mp->key != NULL)
-#define DELETED_ENTRY_P(ptr) ((ptr) == ENTRY_DELETED)
-#define EMPTY_ENTRY_P(ptr) ((ptr) == NULL)
+/* "Next" mapping is the mapping after MP, but wrapping back to
+ MAPPINGS when MP would reach MAPPINGS+SIZE. */
+#define NEXT_MAPPING(mp, mappings, size) (mp != mappings + (size - 1) \
+ ? mp + 1 : mappings)
-/* Find a prime near, but greather than or equal to SIZE. */
+/* Loop over non-empty mappings starting at MP. */
+#define LOOP_NON_EMPTY(mp, mappings, size) \
+ for (; NON_EMPTY (mp); mp = NEXT_MAPPING (mp, mappings, size))
-int
-prime_size (int size)
+/* #### We might want to multiply with the "golden ratio" here to get
+ better randomness for keys that do not result from a good hash
+ function. This is currently not a problem in Wget because we only
+ use the string hash tables. */
+
+#define HASH_POSITION(ht, key) (ht->hash_function (key) % ht->size)
+
+/* Find a prime near, but greather than or equal to SIZE. Of course,
+ the primes are not calculated, but looked up from a table. The
+ table does not contain all primes in range, just a selection useful
+ for this purpose.
+
+ PRIME_OFFSET is a minor optimization: if specified, it starts the
+ search for the prime number beginning with the specific offset in
+ the prime number table. The final offset is stored in the same
+ variable. */
+
+static int
+prime_size (int size, int *prime_offset)
{
static const unsigned long primes [] = {
- 19, 29, 41, 59, 79, 107, 149, 197, 263, 347, 457, 599, 787, 1031,
+ 13, 19, 29, 41, 59, 79, 107, 149, 197, 263, 347, 457, 599, 787, 1031,
1361, 1777, 2333, 3037, 3967, 5167, 6719, 8737, 11369, 14783,
19219, 24989, 32491, 42257, 54941, 71429, 92861, 120721, 156941,
204047, 265271, 344857, 448321, 582821, 757693, 985003, 1280519,
10445899, 13579681, 17653589, 22949669, 29834603, 38784989,
50420551, 65546729, 85210757, 110774011, 144006217, 187208107,
243370577, 316381771, 411296309, 534685237, 695090819, 903618083,
- 1174703521, 1527114613, 1985248999, 2580823717UL, 3355070839UL
+ 1174703521, 1527114613, 1985248999,
+ (unsigned long)0x99d43ea5, (unsigned long)0xc7fa5177
};
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (primes); i++)
+ int i = *prime_offset;
+
+ for (; i < countof (primes); i++)
if (primes[i] >= size)
- return primes[i];
- /* huh? */
- return size;
+ {
+ /* Set the offset to the next prime. That is safe because,
+ next time we are called, it will be with a larger SIZE,
+ which means we could never return the same prime anyway.
+ (If that is not the case, the caller can simply reset
+ *prime_offset.) */
+ *prime_offset = i + 1;
+ return primes[i];
+ }
+
+ abort ();
+ return 0;
}
-/* Create a hash table of INITIAL_SIZE with hash function
- HASH_FUNCTION and test function TEST_FUNCTION. If you wish to
- start out with a "small" table which will be regrown as needed,
- specify 0 as INITIAL_SIZE. */
+/* Create a hash table with hash function HASH_FUNCTION and test
+ function TEST_FUNCTION. The table is empty (its count is 0), but
+ pre-allocated to store at least ITEMS items.
+
+ ITEMS is the number of items that the table can accept without
+ needing to resize. It is useful when creating a table that is to
+ be immediately filled with a known number of items. In that case,
+ the regrows are a waste of time, and specifying ITEMS correctly
+ will avoid them altogether.
+
+ Note that hash tables grow dynamically regardless of ITEMS. The
+ only use of ITEMS is to preallocate the table and avoid unnecessary
+ dynamic regrows. Don't bother making ITEMS prime because it's not
+ used as size unchanged. To start with a small table that grows as
+ needed, simply specify zero ITEMS.
+
+ If HASH_FUNCTION is not provided, identity table is assumed,
+ i.e. key pointers are compared as keys. If you want strings with
+ equal contents to hash the same, use make_string_hash_table. */
struct hash_table *
-hash_table_new (int initial_size,
+hash_table_new (int items,
unsigned long (*hash_function) (const void *),
int (*test_function) (const void *, const void *))
{
- struct hash_table *ht
- = (struct hash_table *)xmalloc (sizeof (struct hash_table));
- ht->hash_function = hash_function;
- ht->test_function = test_function;
- ht->size = prime_size (initial_size);
- ht->fullness = 0;
- ht->count = 0;
- ht->pairs = xmalloc (ht->size * sizeof (struct ht_pair));
- memset (ht->pairs, '\0', ht->size * sizeof (struct ht_pair));
+ int size;
+ struct hash_table *ht = xnew (struct hash_table);
+
+ ht->hash_function = hash_function ? hash_function : ptrhash;
+ ht->test_function = test_function ? test_function : ptrcmp;
+
+ ht->prime_offset = 0;
+
+ /* Calculate the size that ensures that the table will store at
+ least ITEMS keys without the need to resize. */
+ size = 1 + items / HASH_FULLNESS_THRESHOLD;
+ size = prime_size (size, &ht->prime_offset);
+ ht->size = size;
+ ht->resize_threshold = size * HASH_FULLNESS_THRESHOLD;
+ /*assert (ht->resize_threshold >= items);*/
+
+ ht->mappings = xnew0_array (struct mapping, ht->size);
+ ht->count = 0;
+
return ht;
}
void
hash_table_destroy (struct hash_table *ht)
{
- free (ht->pairs);
- free (ht);
+ xfree (ht->mappings);
+ xfree (ht);
+}
+
+/* The heart of most functions in this file -- find the mapping whose
+ KEY is equal to key, using linear probing. Returns the mapping
+ that matches KEY, or the first empty mapping if none matches. */
+
+static inline struct mapping *
+find_mapping (const struct hash_table *ht, const void *key)
+{
+ struct mapping *mappings = ht->mappings;
+ int size = ht->size;
+ struct mapping *mp = mappings + HASH_POSITION (ht, key);
+ int (*equals) PARAMS ((const void *, const void *)) = ht->test_function;
+
+ LOOP_NON_EMPTY (mp, mappings, size)
+ if (equals (key, mp->key))
+ break;
+ return mp;
}
/* Get the value that corresponds to the key KEY in the hash table HT.
If no value is found, return NULL. Note that NULL is a legal value
for value; if you are storing NULLs in your hash table, you can use
- hash_table_exists to be sure that a (possibly NULL) value exists in
- the table. */
+ hash_table_contains to be sure that a (possibly NULL) value exists
+ in the table. Or, you can use hash_table_get_pair instead of this
+ function. */
void *
-hash_table_get (struct hash_table *ht, const void *key)
+hash_table_get (const struct hash_table *ht, const void *key)
{
- int location = ht->hash_function (key) % ht->size;
- while (1)
- {
- struct ht_pair *the_pair = ht->pairs + location;
- if (EMPTY_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key))
- return NULL;
- else if (DELETED_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key)
- || !ht->test_function (key, the_pair->key))
- {
- ++location;
- if (location == ht->size)
- location = 0;
- }
- else
- return the_pair->value;
- }
+ struct mapping *mp = find_mapping (ht, key);
+ if (NON_EMPTY (mp))
+ return mp->value;
+ else
+ return NULL;
}
-/* Return 1 if KEY exists in HT, 0 otherwise. */
+/* Like hash_table_get, but writes out the pointers to both key and
+ value. Returns non-zero on success. */
int
-hash_table_exists (struct hash_table *ht, const void *key)
+hash_table_get_pair (const struct hash_table *ht, const void *lookup_key,
+ void *orig_key, void *value)
{
- int location = ht->hash_function (key) % ht->size;
- while (1)
+ struct mapping *mp = find_mapping (ht, lookup_key);
+ if (NON_EMPTY (mp))
{
- struct ht_pair *the_pair = ht->pairs + location;
- if (EMPTY_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key))
- return 0;
- else if (DELETED_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key)
- || !ht->test_function (key, the_pair->key))
- {
- ++location;
- if (location == ht->size)
- location = 0;
- }
- else
- return 1;
+ if (orig_key)
+ *(void **)orig_key = mp->key;
+ if (value)
+ *(void **)value = mp->value;
+ return 1;
}
+ else
+ return 0;
}
-#define MAX(i, j) (((i) >= (j)) ? (i) : (j))
+/* Return 1 if HT contains KEY, 0 otherwise. */
+
+int
+hash_table_contains (const struct hash_table *ht, const void *key)
+{
+ struct mapping *mp = find_mapping (ht, key);
+ return NON_EMPTY (mp);
+}
/* Grow hash table HT as necessary, and rehash all the key-value
- pairs. */
+ mappings. */
static void
grow_hash_table (struct hash_table *ht)
{
- int i;
- struct ht_pair *old_pairs = ht->pairs;
- int old_count = ht->count; /* for assert() below */
- int old_size = ht->size;
-
- /* Normally, the idea is to double ht->size (and round it to next
- prime) on each regrow:
+ struct mapping *old_mappings = ht->mappings;
+ struct mapping *old_end = ht->mappings + ht->size;
+ struct mapping *mp, *mappings;
+ int newsize;
- ht->size = prime_size (ht->size * 2);
+ newsize = prime_size (ht->size * HASH_RESIZE_FACTOR, &ht->prime_offset);
+#if 0
+ printf ("growing from %d to %d; fullness %.2f%% to %.2f%%\n",
+ ht->size, newsize,
+ 100.0 * ht->count / ht->size,
+ 100.0 * ht->count / newsize);
+#endif
- But it is possible that the table has large fullness because of
- the many deleted entries. If that is the case, we don't want to
- blindly grow the table; we just want to rehash it. For that
- reason, we use ht->count as the relevant parameter. MAX is used
- only because we don't want to actually shrink the table. (But
- maybe that's wrong.) */
+ ht->size = newsize;
+ ht->resize_threshold = newsize * HASH_FULLNESS_THRESHOLD;
- int needed_size = prime_size (ht->count * 2);
- ht->size = MAX (old_size, needed_size);
+ ht->mappings = mappings = xnew0_array (struct mapping, ht->size);
- ht->pairs = xmalloc (ht->size * sizeof (struct ht_pair));
- memset (ht->pairs, '\0', ht->size * sizeof (struct ht_pair));
+ for (mp = old_mappings; mp < old_end; mp++)
+ if (NON_EMPTY (mp))
+ {
+ struct mapping *new_mp = mappings + HASH_POSITION (ht, mp->key);
+ /* We don't need to test for uniqueness of keys because all
+ the keys come from the hash table and are therefore known
+ to be unique. */
+ LOOP_NON_EMPTY (new_mp, mappings, newsize)
+ ;
+ *new_mp = *mp;
+ }
- /* Need to reset these two; hash_table_put will reinitialize them. */
- ht->fullness = 0;
- ht->count = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < old_size; i++)
- {
- struct ht_pair *the_pair = old_pairs + i;
- if (!EMPTY_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key)
- && !DELETED_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key))
- hash_table_put (ht, the_pair->key, the_pair->value);
- }
- assert (ht->count == old_count);
- free (old_pairs);
+ xfree (old_mappings);
}
/* Put VALUE in the hash table HT under the key KEY. This regrows the
void
hash_table_put (struct hash_table *ht, const void *key, void *value)
{
- int location = ht->hash_function (key) % ht->size;
- while (1)
+ struct mapping *mp = find_mapping (ht, key);
+ if (NON_EMPTY (mp))
{
- struct ht_pair *the_pair = ht->pairs + location;
- if (EMPTY_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key))
- {
- ++ht->fullness;
- ++ht->count;
- just_insert:
- the_pair->key = (void *)key; /* const? */
- the_pair->value = value;
- break;
- }
- else if (DELETED_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key))
- {
- /* We're replacing a deleteed entry, so ht->count gets
- increased, but ht->fullness remains unchanged. */
- ++ht->count;
- goto just_insert;
- }
- else if (ht->test_function (key, the_pair->key))
- {
- /* We're replacing an existing entry, so ht->count and
- ht->fullness remain unchanged. */
- goto just_insert;
- }
- else
- {
- ++location;
- if (location == ht->size)
- location = 0;
- }
+ /* update existing item */
+ mp->key = (void *)key; /* const? */
+ mp->value = value;
+ return;
}
- if (ht->fullness * 4 > ht->size * 3)
- /* When fullness exceeds 75% of size, regrow the table. */
- grow_hash_table (ht);
+
+ /* If adding the item would make the table exceed max. fullness,
+ grow the table first. */
+ if (ht->count >= ht->resize_threshold)
+ {
+ grow_hash_table (ht);
+ mp = find_mapping (ht, key);
+ }
+
+ /* add new item */
+ ++ht->count;
+ mp->key = (void *)key; /* const? */
+ mp->value = value;
}
-/* Remove KEY from HT. */
+/* Remove a mapping that matches KEY from HT. Return 0 if there was
+ no such entry; return 1 if an entry was removed. */
int
hash_table_remove (struct hash_table *ht, const void *key)
{
- int location = ht->hash_function (key) % ht->size;
- while (1)
+ struct mapping *mp = find_mapping (ht, key);
+ if (!NON_EMPTY (mp))
+ return 0;
+ else
{
- struct ht_pair *the_pair = ht->pairs + location;
- if (EMPTY_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key))
- return 0;
- else if (DELETED_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key)
- || !ht->test_function (key, the_pair->key))
- {
- ++location;
- if (location == ht->size)
- location = 0;
- }
- else
+ int size = ht->size;
+ struct mapping *mappings = ht->mappings;
+
+ mp->key = NULL;
+ --ht->count;
+
+ /* Rehash all the entries following MP. The alternative
+ approach is to mark the entry as deleted, i.e. create a
+ "tombstone". That makes remove faster, but leaves a lot of
+ garbage and slows down hash_table_get and hash_table_put. */
+
+ mp = NEXT_MAPPING (mp, mappings, size);
+ LOOP_NON_EMPTY (mp, mappings, size)
{
- /* We don't really remove an entry from the hash table: we
- just mark it as deleted. This is because there may be
- other entries located after this entry whose hash number
- points to a location before this entry. (Example: keys
- A, B and C have the same hash. If you were to really
- *delete* B from the table, C could no longer be found.)
-
- As an optimization, it might be worthwhile to check
- whether the immediately preceding entry is empty and, if
- so, really delete the pair (set it to empty and decrease
- the fullness along with the count). I *think* it should
- be safe. */
- the_pair->key = ENTRY_DELETED;
- --ht->count;
- return 1;
+ const void *key2 = mp->key;
+ struct mapping *mp_new = mappings + HASH_POSITION (ht, key2);
+
+ /* Find the new location for the key. */
+
+ LOOP_NON_EMPTY (mp_new, mappings, size)
+ if (key2 == mp_new->key)
+ /* The mapping MP (key2) is already where we want it (in
+ MP_NEW's "chain" of keys.) */
+ goto next_rehash;
+
+ *mp_new = *mp;
+ mp->key = NULL;
+
+ next_rehash:
+ ;
}
+ return 1;
}
}
+/* Clear HT of all entries. After calling this function, the count
+ and the fullness of the hash table will be zero. The size will
+ remain unchanged. */
+
void
hash_table_clear (struct hash_table *ht)
{
- memset (ht->pairs, '\0', ht->size * sizeof (struct ht_pair));
- ht->fullness = 0;
- ht->count = 0;
+ memset (ht->mappings, '\0', ht->size * sizeof (struct mapping));
+ ht->count = 0;
}
+/* Map MAPFUN over all the mappings in hash table HT. MAPFUN is
+ called with three arguments: the key, the value, and MAPARG.
+
+ It is undefined what happens if you add or remove entries in the
+ hash table while hash_table_map is running. The exception is the
+ entry you're currently mapping over; you may remove or change that
+ entry. */
+
void
hash_table_map (struct hash_table *ht,
int (*mapfun) (void *, void *, void *),
- void *closure)
+ void *maparg)
{
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i < ht->size; i++)
- {
- struct ht_pair *the_pair = ht->pairs + i;
- if (!EMPTY_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key)
- && !DELETED_ENTRY_P (the_pair->key))
- if (mapfun (the_pair->key, the_pair->value, closure))
+ struct mapping *mp = ht->mappings;
+ struct mapping *end = ht->mappings + ht->size;
+
+ for (; mp < end; mp++)
+ if (NON_EMPTY (mp))
+ {
+ void *key;
+ repeat:
+ key = mp->key;
+ if (mapfun (key, mp->value, maparg))
return;
- }
+ /* hash_table_remove might have moved the adjacent
+ mappings. */
+ if (mp->key != key && NON_EMPTY (mp))
+ goto repeat;
+ }
}
-\f
-/* Support for hash tables whose keys are strings. */
-/* supposedly from the Dragon Book P436. */
-unsigned long
-string_hash (const void *sv)
+/* Return the number of elements in the hash table. This is not the
+ same as the physical size of the hash table, which is always
+ greater than the number of elements. */
+
+int
+hash_table_count (const struct hash_table *ht)
{
- unsigned int h = 0;
- unsigned const char *x = (unsigned const char *) sv;
+ return ht->count;
+}
+\f
+/* Functions from this point onward are meant for convenience and
+ don't strictly belong to this file. However, this is as good a
+ place for them as any. */
- while (*x)
- {
- unsigned int g;
- h = (h << 4) + *x++;
- if ((g = h & 0xf0000000) != 0)
- h = (h ^ (g >> 24)) ^ g;
- }
+/*
+ * Support for hash tables whose keys are strings.
+ *
+ */
+
+/* 31 bit hash function. Taken from Gnome's glib, modified to use
+ standard C types.
+ We used to use the popular hash function from the Dragon Book, but
+ this one seems to perform much better. */
+
+unsigned long
+string_hash (const void *key)
+{
+ const char *p = key;
+ unsigned int h = *p;
+
+ if (h)
+ for (p += 1; *p != '\0'; p++)
+ h = (h << 5) - h + *p;
+
return h;
}
+/* Frontend for strcmp usable for hash tables. */
+
int
string_cmp (const void *s1, const void *s2)
{
return !strcmp ((const char *)s1, (const char *)s2);
}
+/* Return a hash table of preallocated to store at least ITEMS items
+ suitable to use strings as keys. */
+
struct hash_table *
-make_string_hash_table (int initial_size)
+make_string_hash_table (int items)
+{
+ return hash_table_new (items, string_hash, string_cmp);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Support for hash tables whose keys are strings, but which are
+ * compared case-insensitively.
+ *
+ */
+
+/* Like string_hash, but produce the same hash regardless of the case. */
+
+static unsigned long
+string_hash_nocase (const void *key)
{
- return hash_table_new (initial_size, string_hash, string_cmp);
+ const char *p = key;
+ unsigned int h = TOLOWER (*p);
+
+ if (h)
+ for (p += 1; *p != '\0'; p++)
+ h = (h << 5) - h + TOLOWER (*p);
+
+ return h;
}
+/* Like string_cmp, but doing case-insensitive compareison. */
+
+static int
+string_cmp_nocase (const void *s1, const void *s2)
+{
+ return !strcasecmp ((const char *)s1, (const char *)s2);
+}
+
+/* Like make_string_hash_table, but uses string_hash_nocase and
+ string_cmp_nocase. */
+
+struct hash_table *
+make_nocase_string_hash_table (int items)
+{
+ return hash_table_new (items, string_hash_nocase, string_cmp_nocase);
+}
+
+/* Hashing of pointers. Used for hash tables that are keyed by
+ pointer identity. (Common Lisp calls them EQ hash tables, and Java
+ calls them IdentityHashMaps.) */
+
+unsigned long
+ptrhash (const void *ptr)
+{
+ unsigned long key = (unsigned long)ptr;
+ key += (key << 12);
+ key ^= (key >> 22);
+ key += (key << 4);
+ key ^= (key >> 9);
+ key += (key << 10);
+ key ^= (key >> 2);
+ key += (key << 7);
+ key ^= (key >> 12);
+#if SIZEOF_LONG > 4
+ key += (key << 44);
+ key ^= (key >> 54);
+ key += (key << 36);
+ key ^= (key >> 41);
+ key += (key << 42);
+ key ^= (key >> 34);
+ key += (key << 39);
+ key ^= (key >> 44);
+#endif
+ return key;
+}
+
+int
+ptrcmp (const void *ptr1, const void *ptr2)
+{
+ return ptr1 == ptr2;
+}
+
+#if 0
+/* Currently unused: hashing of integers. */
+
+unsigned long
+inthash (unsigned int key)
+{
+ key += (key << 12);
+ key ^= (key >> 22);
+ key += (key << 4);
+ key ^= (key >> 9);
+ key += (key << 10);
+ key ^= (key >> 2);
+ key += (key << 7);
+ key ^= (key >> 12);
+ return key;
+}
+#endif
\f
#ifdef STANDALONE
#include <string.h>
int
-print_hash_table_mapper (const void *key, void *value, void *count)
+print_hash_table_mapper (void *key, void *value, void *count)
{
++*(int *)count;
printf ("%s: %s\n", (const char *)key, (char *)value);
if (len <= 1)
continue;
line[--len] = '\0';
- hash_table_put (ht, strdup (line), "here I am!");
- if (len % 2)
- hash_table_remove (ht, line);
+ if (!hash_table_contains (ht, line))
+ hash_table_put (ht, strdup (line), "here I am!");
+#if 1
+ if (len % 5 == 0)
+ {
+ char *line_copy;
+ if (hash_table_get_pair (ht, line, &line_copy, NULL))
+ {
+ hash_table_remove (ht, line);
+ xfree (line_copy);
+ }
+ }
+#endif
}
- print_hash (ht);
#if 0
- printf ("%d %d %d\n", ht->count, ht->fullness, ht->size);
+ print_hash (ht);
+#endif
+#if 1
+ printf ("%d %d\n", ht->count, ht->size);
#endif
return 0;
}
projects / wget / blobdiff